Thursday 16 January 2020

Campaign response – Letter from your constituent



Thank you to the constituents who have contacted me about child refugees and possible amendments from the Lords on this issue.

I have been always been clear that we need a new immigration system that is robust and effective while being compassionate to those who most need our help.

For instance I am immensely proud of our country’s record of giving sanctuary to thousands of Jewish children and families fleeing from the Holocaust during the War.

I will be meeting with representatives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in London this week to discuss this issue and I look forward to working with them and other agencies to ensure that the UK’s policy on child refugees is fit for purpose.

I refer constituents to my most recent response to a very similar email campaign titled “Email your MP: Save refugee family reunion”:

“I fully understand how important and emotive an issue like child refugees is to many, and I welcome the Government’s confirmation that its policy on child refugees has not changed and that it will continue to do all it can to enable children to claim asylum and be reunited with their families. It is in both the UK and the EU’s interest to continue cooperation on asylum matters after Brexit.

In response to a Labour MP’s questioning on this matter during the Second Reading of the Withdrawal Agreement Bill, the Prime Minister said in the House Commons:

“We remain absolutely committed to ensuring that this country will continue to receive unaccompanied children. We have led Europe and received thousands already—this country has a proud record—and we will continue to do so.”

The UK has made a significant contribution to protecting vulnerable children, providing protection to more than 39,500 children since the start of 2010. In 2018, the UK received the third highest number of asylum claims from unaccompanied children in the EU.

The Government remain fully committed to relocating 480 children under section 67 (also known as the Dubs Amendment) and are continuing to make progress to achieve that objective.

Answering another MP’s questioning, he added:

“We remain proud of our work in receiving unaccompanied children. We will continue to support fully the purpose and spirit of the Dubs amendment, but this is not the place—in this Bill—to do so. The Government remain absolutely committed to doing so.”

In Boris Johnson I see a Prime Minister who will be more liberal, open and compassionate when it comes to immigration, asylum and refugees matters, than many previous Conservative Prime Ministers.

I also agree with him that the Withdrawal Agreement Bill is not the right place to debate family reunification of child refugees or asylum seekers. The Bill is narrow in scope – it is fundamentally about facilitating as smooth and effective a Brexit as possible.

I voted against the amendments on child refugees not because I am against the resettlement or family reunification of child refugees, but because I believe that it would be wrong to bind the Government’s hands in any way as it seeks to negotiate an effective Brexit.

There will be many future opportunities to discuss the very important issue of child refugees, such as the various stages of the Immigration and Social Security Bill, and to build on the work that our country has already done to help refugees and refugee children.

Since 2016, Britain has resettled more refugees from outside Europe than any other EU state and we will continue to do all we can to help the world’s most vulnerable.

The newly announced Global Refugee Resettlement Scheme, which builds on the incredible achievement of resettling over 20,000 vulnerable refugees through the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme(VPRS) and Vulnerable Children’s Resettlement Scheme (VCRS), will help thousands more people fleeing conflict and persecution, including children, to build a new life in the UK.

It might be of interest to constituents that in the previous Parliament, I sat on the Bill Committee for Angus MacNeil MP’s (SNP) Private Member’s Bill on Family Reunion of Refugees and had meetings with groups like the British Red Cross and the UNHCR to understand the need for vulnerable refugees around the world to be reunited with their family members in the UK. In the past two years I have also been working with a cross-party group of MPs including Tim Farron MP (Liberal Democrats) and Kate Green MP (Labour) on various immigration, asylum and refugees issues, through my participation on the All Party Parliamentary Group on Migration and on the RAMP Project.

The UK has a proud history of welcoming and supporting those who are most in need of protection. I will continue to engage with the issue of children refugees and work with MPs from other parties to make sure that we are giving safe sanctuary and pathway to family reunification for refugees, while restoring the public’s trust in our asylum and refugee system by ensuring that it is done in a fair and managed manner.”