Monday 29 October 2018

Campaign reply on Arms Embargo against Israel


A number of my constituents have recently written to me to ask if I would support an arms embargo against Israel.
Israel is a long-term ally of the UK and shares many mutual interests, including close intelligence and military cooperation.
As a country renowned for its high-tech expertise, the UK benefits from Israeli military technology. Israeli technology that the UK uses include battlefield medical technology, techniques for dealing with suicide bombers, and technology to counter remotely-detonated terrorist bombs. Israeli drone technology such as the Watchkeeper WK45 has also been used by British forces in Afghanistan for intelligence collection. These technologies have protected the lives of many British soldiers. 
An arms embargo on Israel and the wider boycott campaign stands to be damaging for UK-Israel bilateral relations, and also counterproductive to the peace process. The British Government and I will continue to support efforts to restart direct peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, in order to achieve a lasting and viable two-state solution. These talks are absolutely necessary in order to address the crucial final-status issues of borders, the status of Jerusalem, Israel’s security concerns, settlements, and Palestinian sovereignty.
For a lasting peace, it is essential for the Palestinian Authority to educate its people towards peace and coexistence with Israel. It must uphold the Quartet Principles that it has committed itself to: to recognise Israel’s right to exist; to abide by previous diplomatic agreements; and to renounce and distance itself from violence.
The PA must end the glorification of terrorists and incitement, including the naming of schools and sports tournaments after murderers who have killed Israelis, which have inspired so many violent acts against Israelis.
I trust that this adequately answers the issues my constituents raised.