Wednesday 3 April 2019

Campaign response – Revoke Article 50



A number of constituents who support a revocation of Article 50 have written to me asking if I would reconsider my position on Brexit.

It opens with “It’s a turd of a deal, but it’s better than crashing out; however, you must surely know that the best thing is to remain”.

I am glad that they have taken note of my particular choice of words in describing the Brexit deal which has been received much media attention.

That said, I disagree with the rest of their proposition as set out in the email, namely that we would be better off remaining in the EU and that “it makes no sense at all” to pursue Brexit.

My views on Brexit will be well known to them by now. 

What makes no sense to me and to the majority of the voters who for Brexit in the 2016 referendum is in fact any notion that we should revoke Article 50.

It is often forgotten these days that in 2017 the House of Commons voted by a majority of 384 votes (498-114) to trigger Article 50.

MPs including many who now advocate remaining in the EU, voted two years ago in favour of leaving of the EU.

The people of the United Kingdom, and the constituents of St Austell and Newquay especially by nearly a 2-1 margin, voted for our great nation to leave our membership of the European Union.

A key fundamental principle of our representative democracy is that when politicians go to the people to seek their views in a referendum or election, they are obliged to then deliver the outcome of that vote.

From the 1975 EEC Referendum to the 2011 Alternative Vote Referendum, the politicians that allowed the national referendum to take place has always delivered on the results of that particular referendum.

This does not mean the people are then forever bound to that decision, but it is incumbent upon government of the time to always deliver the results of the referendum after it is held, before subsequent governments can go back to the people to seek their opinion a second time.

I do not write these rules; this is simply how democracy works.

I am a democrat and I believe that in order to safeguard our democracy we need to implement the will of the nation, as expressed in the results of the referendum, by leaving the European Union as soon as possible.

Our future is bright outside of the European Union and I will continue to work hard to ensure that we have a deal that fully delivers the results of the 2016 referendum and for every constituent.