Monday, 29 October 2018

Campaign response - Help us stop the government banning .50 calibre rifles


With the Offensive Weapons Bill due to receive its Third Reading and Report Stage in Parliament, a number of constituents have recently got in touch to seek my view on bill’s proposed ban on weapons with a muzzle energy of more than 13,600 joules or 10,000 foot-pounds, particularly .50 calibre single-shot target rifles.

I share their concerns that the proposed ban could disproportionately affect legally licensed gun owners.

Policymaking needs to be underpinned by clear evidence. The Home Office has suggested that the proposed ban will help tackle gun crimes in the UK. However, instances of such weapons being likely to fall into the wrong hands are incredibly rare. As Sir Geoffrey has previously pointed out in a parliamentary debate regarding the bill, “there was one incident when one was stolen; the barrel was chopped down but the gun was quickly recovered and never implicated in a crime. There has been only one other incident: more than 20 years ago, a .50 calibre weapon was stolen in Northern Ireland and used in the troubles and then, again, recovered.”

These heavy and bulky weapons, which are often longer than the length of one’s arm, are simply not the criminal’s weapon of choice; they are far more likely to turn to smaller, less powerful and less unwieldy firearms.

Instead of achieving its stated objective of preventing gun crimes, I am concerned that this proposed ban will bring unintended consequences by ending the well-established and legitimate sporting use of these rifles, namely in target shooting. For instance, over 400 members of the Fifty Calibre Shooters Association (FCSA) in the UK regularly compete in the annual World Championship in the US representing Great Britain. The UK FCSA is a Home Office Approved Club. Were the bill to be passed with its current wording, it would bring to an end the club’s legitimate sporting activity, which to date has a flawless safety record and is undertaken by individuals already deemed safe through police vetting processes.

I am keen to see the Government reverse its thinking on this ban and will therefore be supporting Sir Geoffrey’s amendments at the Report Stage of the Offensive Weapons Bill when it comes before Parliament.